Reflections on the Assassination of Osama Bin Laden
The United States Constitution is one of the highest points on humanity's road out of barbarism and into civilization.
Here, for the first time, was a constitution based on separation of powers and the Rule of Law.
One of the more painful aspects of the Rule of Law is that, however heinous the crime, 'due process' separates civilization from barbarism, and removes
the lynch mob as a means of dispensing 'justice'.
In assassinating Osama bin Laden the USA has taken another step back from the vision of it's founding fathers.
In the torrent of obfuscation following the assassination it has also proved to be incompetent, since it could not present a narrative of events without
further modifying it on a frequent basis.
Worse, however, is the long record of the USA's terror, first against the pre-Columbian inhabitants - 'manifest destiny' - then against central and
south American countries - [2] - and finally world-wide after the Second World War, when the Cold War provided a cover for adventures such as the costly failure to
'save' South Vietnam from falling under the domination of it's northern neighbour.
The USA's alleged concern for freedom and democracy is circumscribed by its larger enthusiasm for world-wide economic domination.
Like Britain before it, the USA regarded the Middle East's oil reserves as a strategic resource. In 1951 the interests of both powers overlapped when
Dr Mossadeq - Prime Minister of Iran - nationalised the country's British-owned oil fields.
This set in motion the chain of events which led to the overthrow of the Shah - widely perceived to be a Western stooge by his own people.
In turn this led to the USA - and other Western powers like Britain - supporting Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran in September 1980.
Support included
Chemical and Biological exports, which became part of Iraq's biological warfare program.
[Halabja]
Meanwhile, the USA's interest in Central and South America continued, and surfaced at its most spectacular in the part played by the CIA in the
Chilean revolution of 09 September 1973. [1973]
Guided by the neoliberal social Darwinism of Milton Friedman's Chicago Boys, General August Pinochet 'liberalised' Chile's economy, persecuting opponents
in a Hitlerian manner via Operation Condor.
Corporate America's faith in neoliberalism may have overreached itself as a result of Milton Friedman's visit to China, in 1980, to advise Deng Xiaoping on
converting China to a corporate economy. (*)
China's human rights record is an easy target, and one which the egregious Mr David Cameron has also targetted, but the West is the proverbial blackened pot
berating the filthy kettle. [DC]
To sum up: the assassination of Osama bin Laden is at one with the United States' deplorable record of tramping round the world, like some latter day Imperial
Rome, in the belief that might is right, and that all problems can be sorted out - as
Johann Hari so apptly
puts it - with a blowtorch, rather than a scalpel.
Whether it was United Fruit killing strikers, support for the Samozas in Nicaragua,
the murder of President Allende, the trashing of Bhopal, or 'collateral damage' in Iraq and Afghanistan, the message is the same: mess with the US at your
peril.
The US does not do 'Rule of Law' for enemies, in fact they don't do it for the likes of
Bradley Manning either.
The problem with China, however, is that for the first time the USA is confronted with another big guy on the block, and one who is not amenable to
bullying.
Bin Laden - and his followers - might be useful for putting the frighteners on the victims of corporate neoliberalism's many failings, but it is China that is
the real threat to America's great power status.
[D&F]
(*)
The Shock Doctrine pp 184ff